Follow and we Follow back on twitter

Top Gaming Computers

Follow us on twitter the M2e Social Media People we will follow you back

From an acorn Grows the mighty Oak Tree

From an acorn Grows the mighty Oak Tree
From an acorn Grows the mighty Oak Tree Treeha

M2E

M2E
Me2everyone PLC

TreeHa


Create a Website

Followers

Follow M2E on Twitter.

Follow M2E on Twitter.
Click Here.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Under Aga Children in the UK using Social Media



U.K. Kids Start Social Networking Way Under the Age Limit

BY ADDY DUGDALEFri Mar 26, 2010


facebook kid


survey of kids in the U.K. has found that a quarter of them have a presence on a social network--way below the age limit of 13. As well as proving the theory that if you want to figure out your tech problems, go ask a tweenager, last year's Children's Media Literacy Audit from government watchdog Ofcom threw up some interesting gems. Let's check out the stats.

  • 25% of the children surveyed admitted that they had a profile on either MySpace, Bebo, or Facebook.
  • 90% of their parents oversaw their kids' Internet activity (or so they said).
  • 17% of the kids' parents were unaware of their offsprings' social media presence.
  • 44% of kids thought that illegal downloading shouldn't be illegal (yay!).
  • 37% of 5- to 7-year-olds had visited Facebook.
  • 18% of 8- to 11-year-olds visit blogs and sites such as Wikipedia, with a high rate of believing all they read.
  • 48% of 12- to 15-year-olds visit the same websites, with only 48% believing the information.

This is great news for 
social marketeers, for starters--although it's probably nothing they hadn't already guessed, otherwise, how do you explain so many of the, frankly, puerile apps for Facebook?


It's not great news for the music and film companies or any of the governments who are pushing for a three-strikes policy on piracy. What is to be remembered, however, is that people's attitudes on illegal downloading of content change as they grow older. It's called growing up.


It's doubtful this news will force the social media sites to make their criteria for starting a profile more difficult. Despite some British media outlets' attempts to turn Facebook into the online equivalent of Osama Bin Laden's sweaty armpit--It causes syphilis! It turns you into a sad and lonely husk of a person! Look, little person, there's a pedophile hiding in the bushes next to your computer monitor!--it's not going to go away. If anything, it's going to give Facebook an even
greater influence in the world. How does that Jesuit motto go again? Give me a child until he is seven, and I will give you the man. Parents, just be thankful it's not ChatRoulette.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Saturday, April 24, 2010

TreeHa Pavilion & Me2everyone PLC Head Office






Registered 19-Mar to become the exclusive portal for the Trees Program aiming to plant +1 billion trees across the planet

More than half of Facebook users may quit site, poll finds

News
More than half of Facebook users may quit site, poll finds
Privacy concerns have already pushed 16% of survey respondents to abandon Facebook

By Sharon Gaudin
May 21, 2010 12:11 PM ETComments (27)Recommended (8)
Facebook
Twitter
Share
Computerworld - More than half of Facebook users are considering dumping the popular social networking site because of privacy concerns, according to the results a new Sophos poll.

Abingdon, U.K.-based Sophos said 16% of poll respondents said have already stopped using Facebook because of privacy issues. The results of the online poll of some 1,600 Facebook users, released this week, found that 30% are "highly likely" to quit Facebook due to privacy concerns, and another 30% said it was "possible" they would leave the site for the same reason.

Meanwhile, 12% of respondents said that won't leave he site and 12% said it's "not likely" that they'll quit Facebook.

"I was expecting a good proportion of people to be concerned about the privacy problems with Facebook based upon the typical users who read my [security] blog, but to see such a large percentage saying it was "highly likely" that they would quit or that they had already left was a surprise to me," said Graham Cluley, a senior technology consultant, today.

Privacy Watch
More than half of Facebook users may quit site, poll finds
Social networks may be sharing your info with advertisers
Google hit with class-action lawsuit over Wi-Fi snooping
Facebook fixing embarrassing privacy bug
Privacy expert: It's good PR to say no to the government
EFF: Forget cookies, your browser has fingerprints
FTC asked to investigate Google Wi-Fi 'snooping'
Lawmakers unveil online privacy bill
Report blames IT staff for school Webcam 'spying' mess
SEC workers spent hours at work watching online porn
More in Privacy Center
Cluley noted that IT workers are more concerned with Facebook privacy issues than non-techies.

"I think for people who work in the IT security field, it's becoming harder and harder to justify being on Facebook," he added. "The number of privacy problems are making more people realize that it may not be where they want to be. Of course, some people may simply reduce the amount of data that they publish on the site rather than quit. The average guy on the street, meanwhile, will probably need a bigger push to quit the site."

Cluley added that a lot of people have become addicted to posting updates and pictures about their lives on the site, and would find probably find it difficult quit Facebook cold turkey.

This growing unrest comes amid mounting ire that Facebook is moving to share user data with other Web sites. Users have also increasingly expressed frustration with the complexity of the site's privacy controls.

In an interview with Computerworld earlier this month, Ethan Beard, director of Facebook's developer network, defended the company's privacy policies. Beard contended that users love the site's new features, and theorized that the mounting criticism isn't coming from users.

Facebook, though, has started making moves that indicate it may be moving towards changing the privacy settings to assuage critics.

"We have heard from our users that our efforts to provide granular control have made things too complex," said Andrew Noyes, a spokesman for Facebook. "Of course we're working on responding to these concerns but we don't have anything further to announce. "

Cluley said Facebook needs to do an about-face when it comes to privacy.

"I think Facebook needs to fundamentally change its attitude towards privacy, putting the needs of its users first and foremost rather than its balance sheets," he added. "Users are not going to appreciate 'bait-and-switch' tactics where they believed they were putting information up on the site which would be kept private, only to find their privacy slowly being eroded."

Facebook and Others Caught Sending User Data to Advertisers

Facebook and Others Caught Sending User Data to Advertisers

The Wall Street Journal is reporting on what could be a major scandal brewing for Facebook, MySpace and other social networks: despite assurances to the contrary, the sites have apparently been sending personal and identifiable information about users to their advertisers without consent.

Large advertising companies including Google’s DoubleClick and Yahoo’s Right Media were identified as having received information including usernames or ID numbers that could be traced back to individual profiles as users clicked on ads. The data could potentially be used to look up personal information about the user, including real name, age, occupation, location, and anything else made public on the profile. Both of the aforementioned companies denied being aware of the “extra” data they were receiving and claim they have not made use of it.

The WSJ goes on to report that since raising questions about the practice with FacebookFacebook and MySpaceMySpace, both companies have since rewritten at least some of the code that allowed transmission of identifiable data. Beyond those two companies, LiveJournal, Hi5Hi5, XangaXanga and DiggDigg made the list of sites identified as sending identifiable information back to advertisers when a user clicked on individual ads.

The Journal found that Facebook went farther than most in sharing identifiable data, by sending the username of the person clicking the ad as well as the username of the profile they were viewing at the time. This news could hardly come at a worse time for Facebook, a company that currently faces a privacy backlash potent enough to make the cover of Time Magazine this month.

Outside of Facebook, the other companies named in the article maintain the data they send to advertisers contains the user ID of the profile a user is visiting when they click on an ad, and not the user ID of the visitor themselves. Both Google and Yahoo made strong statements refuting the idea that they would ever make use of any such personally identifiable data. Yahoo VP of global policy Anne Toth said of the allegations, “We prohibit clients from sending personally identifiable information to us. We have told them. ‘We don’t want it. You shouldn’t be sending it to us. If it happens to be there, we are not looking for it.’”

What do you think: is this another privacy-related stain on Facebook as well as other social networks, or much ado about nothing?